🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, governments are investing hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – creating their own AI technologies. From Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, countries are racing to build AI that comprehends regional dialects and cultural specifics.

The Global AI Arms Race

This initiative is a component of a larger global contest led by large firms from the US and the People's Republic of China. While firms like OpenAI and Meta allocate substantial resources, mid-sized nations are additionally taking independent gambles in the AI landscape.

Yet amid such vast sums at stake, is it possible for less wealthy nations secure notable benefits? As noted by an expert from an influential policy organization, “Unless you’re a rich state or a large corporation, it’s quite a burden to build an LLM from scratch.”

Security Issues

Numerous nations are reluctant to rely on external AI systems. Across India, as an example, American-made AI solutions have occasionally proven inadequate. A particular example featured an AI tool deployed to educate pupils in a remote area – it spoke in English with a thick US accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for native listeners.

Then there’s the defence aspect. For the Indian security agencies, relying on particular external systems is seen as unacceptable. As one entrepreneur commented, “It could have some unvetted data source that might say that, for example, a certain region is separate from India … Utilizing that certain model in a military context is a big no-no.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to individuals who are in defence. They aim to use AI, but, disregarding specific systems, they don’t even want to rely on US platforms because information could travel outside the country, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Efforts

As a result, some states are backing domestic initiatives. An example this project is underway in the Indian market, where an organization is attempting to create a domestic LLM with public funding. This effort has allocated roughly 1.25 billion dollars to machine learning progress.

The founder envisions a system that is more compact than leading models from Western and Eastern corporations. He states that the country will have to offset the resource shortfall with expertise. “Being in India, we do not possess the luxury of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we vie versus say the hundreds of billions that the United States is devoting? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Local Focus

Across Singapore, a government initiative is supporting machine learning tools educated in the region's native tongues. These dialects – including the Malay language, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and others – are often inadequately covered in Western-developed LLMs.

I hope the individuals who are developing these independent AI tools were aware of how rapidly and just how fast the leading edge is progressing.

An executive involved in the project notes that these models are created to supplement larger systems, as opposed to substituting them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he comments, often have difficulty with regional languages and culture – communicating in awkward Khmer, for example, or proposing pork-based dishes to Malaysian individuals.

Creating native-tongue LLMs allows local governments to incorporate cultural nuance – and at least be “informed users” of a sophisticated tool created overseas.

He further explains, I am prudent with the concept independent. I think what we’re trying to say is we want to be more adequately included and we wish to grasp the abilities” of AI technologies.

Cross-Border Cooperation

For nations attempting to find their place in an intensifying global market, there’s an alternative: collaborate. Researchers associated with a well-known institution put forward a public AI company shared among a consortium of developing nations.

They term the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, in reference to the European productive strategy to create a rival to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. The plan would see the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the assets of several countries’ AI initiatives – such as the UK, Spain, the Canadian government, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to develop a viable alternative to the American and Asian leaders.

The lead author of a study outlining the proposal says that the idea has drawn the consideration of AI officials of at least several states to date, as well as a number of state AI companies. While it is now focused on “mid-sized nations”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have likewise expressed interest.

He comments, In today’s climate, I think it’s simply reality there’s reduced confidence in the commitments of the existing White House. Individuals are wondering for example, should we trust any of this tech? In case they decide to